Liberal Advocacy Group Demand Justice Returns with Urgent Call to Defend the Courts
In a bold resurgence, the progressive legal advocacy group Demand Justice has relaunched its campaign urging Democratic lawmakers to take a stronger, more unified stance against what it describes as former President Donald J. Trump’s systematic effort to “dismantle and corrupt” the U.S. legal system and federal judiciary.
What’s Driving the Campaign?
According to the group, Trump’s influence over the federal courts—bolstered by more than 200 judicial appointments during his term—continues to shape rulings that undermine civil rights, voting access, and democratic norms. With Trump again a leading 2028 presidential contender, Demand Justice warns that inaction from Democrats risks cementing a conservative judicial legacy for decades.
- Launched originally in 2018, Demand Justice played a key role in opposing Trump’s judicial nominees.
- The group is now calling on Democrats to publicly denounce court rulings seen as politically motivated.
- It’s also pushing for structural reforms, including term limits for Supreme Court justices and court expansion.
Key Demands from Demand Justice
Priority | Action Item |
---|---|
Immediate | Public condemnation of rulings undermining election integrity and civil liberties |
Legislative | Pass the Judiciary Act to impose 18-year term limits on Supreme Court justices |
Long-Term | Expand lower federal courts to counter conservative judicial dominance |

Why Now?
Recent rulings from Trump-appointed judges—including decisions limiting federal agency authority and restricting reproductive rights—have reignited concerns about judicial overreach. Demand Justice argues that Democrats’ silence or muted responses signal tacit acceptance.
“Lawmakers must demonstrate steadfast opposition to the dismantling and corruption of our legal system, courts, and the rule of law,” the group stated in its relaunch memo.
For deeper context on judicial appointments and their long-term impact, see our analysis on [INTERNAL_LINK:judicial-reform].