Trump Administration Asks Colleges to Sign ‘Compact’ to Get Funding Preference

Sign or Lose Funding: Trump Admin’s 10-Point ‘Compact’ Shakes Elite U.S. Universities

Colleges Face Ultimatum: Pledge Loyalty to Trump Agenda or Risk Federal Funds

In a sweeping move that has reignited debates over academic freedom and federal overreach, the Trump administration has sent a 10-page “compact” to nine of the nation’s most prestigious universities—demanding they adopt sweeping policy changes in exchange for preferential access to federal research funding.

White House exterior with American flag, symbolizing federal pressure on universities

What’s in the Compact?

The agreement, signed by Education Secretary Linda McMahon and top White House officials, outlines a series of non-negotiable conditions:

  • Ban race and sex considerations in admissions and hiring
  • Freeze tuition for five years to curb rising college costs
  • Cap international student enrollment to prioritize domestic applicants
  • Adopt strict binary definitions of gender across campus policies
  • Restructure governance to protect “conservative ideas” from alleged discrimination

Targeted Universities

Institution Type Annual Federal Research Funding (Est.)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Private $850M+
University of Pennsylvania Private $720M
University of Texas Public $680M
Brown University Private $410M
Dartmouth College Private $320M
Vanderbilt University Private $290M
University of Southern California Private $480M
University of Arizona Public $390M
University of Virginia Public $450M

What’s at Stake?

Colleges that sign the compact would receive “multiple positive benefits,” including:

  • Priority access to competitive federal grants
  • Looser caps on overhead reimbursement rates
  • Expedited clearance from ongoing civil rights investigations

Those that refuse could face continued funding freezes—part of a broader campaign the administration has waged since early 2025 to reshape higher education policy.

Backlash and Legal Questions

Critics argue the compact blurs the line between policy and coercion. “This isn’t collaboration—it’s conditionality with political strings,” said [INTERNAL_LINK:academic-freedom] legal scholar Dr. Elena Ruiz of Georgetown University. Others warn it may violate the First Amendment or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

University leaders are expected to respond by November 15, 2025.

Sources

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top