Landmark Defamation Case Concludes After Viral Election Lies
In a dramatic legal resolution that underscores the real-world consequences of disinformation, Rudy Giuliani and Dominion Voting Systems have reached a settlement in the $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit tied to the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The agreement, announced on September 27, 2025, closes one of the most high-profile cases stemming from the post-election chaos that gripped the nation.
What Happened?
Dominion Voting Systems, an election technology company, accused former New York City Mayor and Trump lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani of launching “a viral disinformation campaign” that falsely claimed Dominion had rigged the 2020 election. Giuliani repeatedly alleged—without evidence—that Dominion machines switched votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden, claims amplified across social media and conservative outlets.
Key Allegations and Consequences
- Giuliani claimed Dominion was part of a global conspiracy involving Venezuela and George Soros.
- Dominion’s employees received death threats following the spread of these falsehoods.
- The company’s reputation and business operations suffered severe reputational and financial damage.
Timeline of the Legal Battle
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| March 2021 | Dominion files $1.3 billion defamation suit against Giuliani |
| 2022–2024 | Court orders Giuliani to turn over financial records; judge rules he acted with “actual malice” |
| 2025 | Giuliani faces mounting legal fees and asset seizures |
| Sept 27, 2025 | Parties announce confidential settlement |
Why This Settlement Matters
While the terms remain confidential, legal experts believe the settlement likely includes a substantial financial payment and a public acknowledgment of wrongdoing. The case has become a cautionary tale about the legal risks of spreading election falsehoods—and a rare victory for accountability in the misinformation era. [INTERNAL_LINK:2020 election disinformation]
Infographic: The Fallout from False Claims

Caption: Rudy Giuliani faced intense legal scrutiny over his 2020 election claims. (Credit: The New York Times)




